22032013
Just look at those meatballs! |
This post is a continuation to:
Day 177: Relationships and cross-gender support
Day 178: Separation of genders
Day 179: The attraction fallacy
Days 180-181: The "safe zone" of intimacy
Day 177: Relationships and cross-gender support
Day 178: Separation of genders
Day 179: The attraction fallacy
Days 180-181: The "safe zone" of intimacy
I've been
dealing with romance and romantic gestures, especially artistic ones
where another dedicates a piece of artistic expression to me. An
excerpt from some private writings:
I have for
all of my relationship history secretly wished for my partners to
gift me with a song or a poem or a painting or something (anything!)
because that would mean I have inspired the other to do something
that is only for me – or more precisely, from me. I realized that
this shit with wanting to have a special exclusive gesture like this
given to you is not actually about receiving something from the
other, but about using the other as an extension of you – I call
this the “evil muse syndrome”, lol. When another i.e. writes a
song that is specifically for me or inspired by me, it has been
created by my effect – it wouldn't have come into existence without
me – and so I elevate myself through the actions of another. “I
made this happen.” “This is MY song.” “I'M the one who
inspired this.” Usually it is not done in an aggressive manner (not
very feminine, now is it) but in a sweet, petite way of saying: “aww,
you did this all for me?” This phrase is very tricky indeed because
it is nothing but self-elevation masked as a compliment.
So I have always
wished for this “special” gesture but never mentioned it to
anyone because it would not be genuine if I asked for it. This is
actually very movie-like now that I think of it, lol, the gesture has
to be just right for it to
mean anything – to give me the perfect fulfillment – for the
energy charge to be exactly the way I have imagined it to be. This
expectation is in no way aligned with the practical reality – it
simply does not make sense to 1) have a desire and not actively
strive to fulfill it 2) have a desire based on no practical purpose,
and 3) believe a relationship is “fulfilling” only when it
reaches some epic proportions of love oozing from every seam as
perfect images and scenes of ladidaa flowers and candlelight and deep
looks in each others eyes and gentle notes from a guitar and shy
hushed voices and BLAH all the shit.
I
have never liked romance. I have found it repulsively sweet and
sugary. I remember even as a child wondering about the purpose of all
that weird mushiness. I mean, I watched Lady and the Tramp as a child
for many times and the love scene with the spaghetti
and the idyllic night with the candle light and the country side
scenery and the couple leaning to each other – it never made any
fucking sense, why would they do that, what's so great about the
italian restaurant anyway, those meatballs sure look tasty – until
I integrated into the relationship system and learned what it was
that grown-ups get out of such scenes of romance and learned to
secretly desire it myself. Even in these movies targeted to children
the relationship ideal is already imposed upon the children who have
no idea what it means.
So
I have pretty much resented romantic gestures throughout my
relationship history but also secretly craved for them. Before I
began dating (age 8-15) I would have fantasies of romance all the
time – and I mean all the time.
As a child/teenager my most common pastime when alone or when
drifting off during a boring class was daydreaming about romantic
fantasies. As a younger child they had more to do with “being
rescued” or other stuff that gave me a sense of security – and
the older I got, the more intimacy I involved in them. The fantasies
usually consisted of movie-like scenes that varied from compilations
of many scenes to single moments, and they revolved around the
feeling of “being special” and being loved, accepted and
recognized – mostly nothing directly sexual, just emotional
feelgood. These were intense energy loops that I trapped myself into
for years as I craved for the pleasurable energy I got from these
fantasies. Whenever I came across something in my real life that
evoked an exciting romantic energy within me, I harnessed it into
material for my fantasies so that the feeling would go on forever.
In
my teen years I grew more cynical about relationships because of
bitterness for not having any relationship experiences, and I
rejected and bashed all notions of romance and love without ever
stopping to realize the contrast between this behavior and my secret
desire to taste all that sweetness myself. Which is what eventually
happened, but even when I was experiencing all that feelgood within
relationships I was unable to deal with romantic gestures – a
boyfriend would bring me flowers and I would not know how to deal
with it – it was as if I was expected to react a certain way and
when I didn't the gesture was kinda drawn back - “if you don't give
me what I was supposed to get as a counter-gift, then why did I bring
you this stupid stuff at all?” (No one actually said this to me,
but this is the “vibe” I got on numerous occasions.) So the
gesture was not given as expression but as a bribe.
So
I guess my problem dealing with these gestures was that I realized
that something was expected of me but I just did not know what it was
– or didn't want to validate it as I saw the dishonesty. People are
somehow expected to treat each other with special gestures like this
to keep each other happy and satisfied. I've been told that these
gestures are to “show one's love towards the other” - to show the
other that you're still committed to them – but why not live as the
commitment and love in each and every moment of co-existence instead
of these occasional special moments that give us the energy to tread
through the rough patches? What if one were to live as love and
commitment within the rough times? Would they, then, be so rough at
all?
Another
point is that it is common for people to base their sense of
self-worth on the perception others have of you, and the validation
one gets from close relationships is the most important, because
finding one's self-value from within self is not really taught
anywhere as we live mostly in relationships of co-dependency. So
these special gestures of love within intimate relationships are
“required” for one to feel like one has value, which explains a
lot of the extreme reactions people go into when one's partner has
not remembered to give acknowledgement in a while. The energy sustenance is
required at a regular interval or otherwise one will feel like shit
and believe one is not loved (or worse, blame it on the other) –
never realizing all the love and acceptance one needs is HERE,
constantly within ourselves.
I'll continue with the points above in specificity in the posts to come.
I think the point about romantic gestures, gifts, etc. is following. You love someone. Your love for them makes you want for them to be happy. At some random moment, you think that perhaps you would give them this gift, perhaps that would give them at least a little bit of extra happiness for a little bit of time. Only that should be expected: a little bit of happiness. No expectations of counter-gifts, changes in levels of self-worth or anything like that. Although, that said, the act of making a romantic gesture usually also creates the positive effect of increased level of commitment on the part of the giver (but that should not be the aim). And if the gift does not bring the loved one any happiness, the only reactions should be sadness on failing to bring happiness to the loved one. This interpretation of gifts and romantic gestures is fully compatible with "living as the commitment and love in each and every moment of co-existence", including "rough times".
VastaaPoista